The Copyright Law in India is the governing law for protecting creative works. It helps creators like writers, artists, musicians and filmmakers keep control over their original creations. Section 63 of this Act is a key part. It sets out punishments for people who deliberately infringe or help others break copyright rules. This section is important because it discourages illegal copying and protects creators’ rights. In 2022, the Supreme Court of India made a big decision about section 63 of Copyright Act. It cleared up confusion about whether these crimes allow police to arrest without a court order. This ruling strengthened copyright protection. This article explains section 63 in simple terms. It covers what the law says, how it works, court decisions and why it matters for legal experts and creators.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
Definition and Scope of Section 63 of Copyright Act
Section 63 of Copyright Act says that anyone who knowingly infringes or helps in infringing a copyright faces punishment or fines. The imprisonment is at least six months but can go up to three years. They also face a fine of at least ₹50,000, which can go up to ₹2,00,000. However, if the copying wasn’t for making money through business, the court can reduce the punishment. The court must explain why it lowers the penalty.
The law also notes that building something that accidentally infringes a copyright isn’t a crime under this section. The rule focuses on people who know they’re infringing the law. It applies to many types of works, like books, software, movies, or music. It also covers helping others infringe the law, like supplying pirated goods.
Essential Elements of the Offense Under Section 63
To prove a crime under section 63 of Copyright Act , certain things must be true. These rules make section 63 strong, but proving them can be hard. Courts need clear evidence to convict someone:
Infringing Copyright: Someone must violate the creator’s rights, like copying or sharing their work without permission.
Knowing It’s Wrong: The person must know they’re breaking the law. Courts need proof of this intent.
Helping Others: Helping someone else infringe copyright, like selling pirated DVDs, also counts. This is called abetment.
Commercial Gain (Optional): The law is tougher on people copying for business profit, but it can apply to non-commercial cases too.
Penalties and Punishments under Section 63 of Copyright Act
Section 63 of Copyright Act sets clear penalties. The minimum imprisonment is six months, but it can go up to three years. The fine ranges from ₹50,000 to ₹2,00,000. For people who infringe the law again, section 63A makes the punishment tougher. Repeat offenders face at least one year in jail and a ₹1,00,000 fine, up to three years and ₹2,00,000.
Section 64 helps police act fast. Officers at least at the sub-inspector level can seize illegal copies without a court order if they believe a crime is happening. Courts decide the final punishment for copyright infringement based on how big the violation was, how much it hurt the creator, and if the person has broken the law before. For small, non-commercial cases, judges can choose lighter penalties.
Judicial Interpretations of Section 63 of Copyright Act
Courts have helped explain section 63 over time. In a 1996 case, State of Andhra Pradesh v. Nagoti Venkataramana, the Supreme Court said just holding illegal copies isn’t enough. The prosecution must show the person knew they were breaking the law.
Different courts had mixed views on whether section 63 crimes allow police to arrest without a court order. Some, like the Kerala High Court, said police need a court’s permission. Others disagreed, causing confusion.
Learn about the role of Copyright in Cyber Law.
The Landmark Supreme Court Judgement: Knit Pro International v. State of NCT of Delhi
In 2022, the Supreme Court settled this confusion in Knit Pro International v. State of NCT of Delhi. The case started with a complaint about copyright violations. The Delhi High Court had stopped the case, saying police couldn’t arrest without a court order.
The Supreme Court disagreed. It looked at the Code of Criminal Procedure, which says crimes with up to three years in imprisonment allow arrests without a warrant. Since section 63 has a maximum of three years, it fits this rule. The Court said these crimes don’t need court permission for police to act. This made section 63 stronger for fighting copyright violations.
Implications of the Ruling
The Supreme Court’s decision has a big impact. It lets police act quickly against illegal copying, which hurts India’s economy, especially in movies and software. This rule matches other laws, like the Trade Marks Act, where similar crimes allow arrests without warrants.
The ruling may lead to more cases and convictions, scaring off people who break copyrights. But there’s a risk. Some worry that creators might misuse this law to target competitors with false complaints. Lawyers now need to warn clients about the stronger penalties. They should also teach creators how to use section 63 to protect their work.
Know about the Rights of Copyright Owner.
Challenges under Section 63 of Copyright Act
Section 63 also faces some challenges. Proving knowledge i.e. someone knew they were infringing the law is tough, especially in online cases with anonymous users. The fines, capped at ₹2,00,000, may not be enough for big digital piracy cases. Some say making copyright violations a crime could limit fair use, like using small parts of a work for education. Also, India’s busy courts can delay cases, making the law less effective. Here’s a table comparing section 63 before and after the 2022 ruling, which shows how the ruling made section 63 of Copyright Act stronger.
Aspect | Pre-2022 Interpretation | Post-2022 Ruling |
Nature of Offense | Often needed court permission for arrests | Allows arrests without court permission |
Police Powers | Needed a magistrate’s order to investigate | Police can arrest and seize without warrant |
Enforcement Impact | Weaker, slower action against violations | Stronger, faster action |
Judicial Consistency | Different courts had different views | Clear, uniform rule from Supreme Court |
Summary
Section 63 of Copyright Act 1957 is a key tool for fighting illegal copying. It balances tough penalties with flexibility for smaller cases. The Supreme Court’s 2022 ruling cleared up confusion, making it easier for police to act without court orders. This strengthens copyright protection in India. However, challenges like proving intent and outdated fines remain. As digital issues like online piracy grow, the law may need updates. Lawyers and creators must stay informed to use this law effectively and protect creative works.
Related Posts
Section 63 of Copyright Act: FAQs
Q1. Does section 63-A of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 stipulate an enhanced penalty for second and subsequent convictions?
Yes, section 63-A imposes a minimum of one year imprisonment and ₹1,00,000 fine for repeat copyright infringement convictions, up to three years and ₹2,00,000.
Q2. What is Section 63 of the IT Act 2000?
Section 63 of the IT Act, 2000, deals with penalties for publishing or transmitting obscene material electronically, with imprisonment up to three years and a fine.
Q3. Is copyright bailable or non-bailable?
Offenses under section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957, are cognizable and non-bailable, as clarified by the Supreme Court in 2022.
Q4. What is Section 63 of the CrPC?
Section 63 of the CrPC allows a police officer to arrest a person without a warrant if they commit a cognizable offense in their presence.
Q5. What is the law of Section 63?
Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957, punishes knowing copyright infringement or abetment with 6 months to 3 years imprisonment and a fine of ₹50,000 to ₹2,00,000.
