Section 19 of Copyright Act explains how to transfer copyright from one person to another. This section makes sure transfers are clear, fair and properly documented to avoid confusion or disputes. It protects both the creator, who made the work, and the assignee, who gets the rights. Over time, amendments have updated Section 19 to handle new challenges in creative industries like movies and digital media. This article explains Section 19 of Copyright Law in India covering its rules, updates, court decisions, and practical tips for creators, businesses, and legal experts.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
Meaning & Provisions under Section 19 Copyright Act
Section 19 of Copyright Act is called "Mode of Assignment" and it sets out the rules for legally transferring copyright. It requires specific steps to make sure transfers are clear and avoid problems from informal deals like verbal agreements, that could lead to arguments. The section applies to all copyrighted works, such as books, songs, paintings, and movies. By setting clear guidelines for transfer agreements, Section 19 ensures that creators have some protections even after giving up their rights. It aims to balance the interests of a creator with the ability to sell or share their work, which supports the objective of Copyright Act of encouraging creativity while allowing business deals.
Section 19 has several parts that explain how to create a valid copyright transfer agreement. These rules are amended over time and act like a checklist to make sure agreements are fair and clear:
Requirement of Written Agreement
Section 19(1) says a copyright transfer must be in writing and signed by the person giving the rights or their authorized representative. Unlike some general contracts that can be verbal, copyright transfers need a written document. This rule prevents disagreements about what was agreed upon, as courts have stressed the need for clear, written proof.
Identification of Work and Rights
Section 19(2) requires the agreement to clearly state the work being transferred, the specific rights of copyright owner involved, and how long and where the transfer applies. For example, if someone transfers rights to a book, the agreement must say if it includes rights to make a movie or just to print copies. This avoids confusion about what rights are being given up.
Royalty and Consideration
Section 19(3) says the agreement must explain how much money, called royalties or other payments, the creator or their heirs will get. It also allows both sides to agree on changes, extensions or ending the deal. This rule protects creators from unfair deals by ensuring they get paid over time and especially for long-term transfers. A 2012 update changed the wording from “royalty payable, if any” to include “royalty and any other consideration payable,” meaning payments can include things like one-time fees, not just ongoing royalties.
Duration and Territorial Extent
If the agreement doesn’t mention how long the transfer lasts, Section 19(5) assumes it’s for five years. If it doesn’t say where the rights apply, Section 19(6) assumes it’s only within India. These rules stop transfers from lasting forever or covering the whole world unless clearly stated, so creators can regain their rights after the time is up.
Lapse of Assignment
Section 19(4) says if the assignee doesn’t use the rights within one year, the transfer expires unless the agreement says otherwise. This “use it or lose it” rule encourages assignees to act quickly and protects creators from transfers that go unused.
Special Provisions for Authors
In 2012, new rules in Sections 19(8), (9), and (10) were added to protect creators. Section 19(8) says a transfer is invalid if it conflicts with rights already given to a copyright society the creator belongs to. Sections 19(9) and (10) ensure creators of works used in movies or music recordings get an equal share of royalties when their work is used in ways beyond the original purpose, like streaming or public performances. These rules help creators in industries like film and music, where big companies often have more power.
Learn what are the punishments for copyright infringement
Amendments to Section 19 Copyright Act
Section 19 has been amended over time to keep up with changes in creative industries. In 1983, the original section was renumbered as Section 19(1). In 1994, new subsections (2) to (7) were added, setting default rules for time limits, locations, and when transfers expire.
The biggest change came in 2012 with the Copyright (Amendment) Act. It added Sections 19(8), (9) and (10) to protect creators’ financial rights in collaborative works like movies and music. It also updated Section 19(3) to include “any other consideration” along with royalties, covering different types of payments. These changes aim to make deals fairer, ensuring creators get paid for new uses of their work like on streaming platforms. However, vague terms like “equal share of royalties” have caused some confusion and led to judicial interpretations.
Related Sections and Their Interplay
Section 19 doesn’t work alone, it connects with other parts of the Copyright Act. Section 18 explains who can own or transfer copyright, including rights to future works. It says the assignee becomes the owner of the transferred rights, but the creator keeps any rights not given away.
Section 19A helps when disputes happen over transfers. It lets the Appellate Board (now replaced by the Commercial Court) cancel a transfer if the assignee doesn’t use the rights and it’s not the creator’s fault. This gives creators a way to fix problems when their work isn’t used.
Section 20 deals with transferring copyright through things like wills or when someone passes away without a will which ensures that the rights go to heirs smoothly. Together, these sections create a system to manage copyright transfers fairly.
Learn about the Nature of Copyright Law
Judicial Interpretations and Case Laws on Section 19 Copyright Act
Courts have explained Section 19 in many cases, showing it must be followed exactly. In Gramophone Company of India Ltd. v. Shanti Films Corporation (1997), the Calcutta High Court said transfers must be in writing, rejecting claims based on verbal agreements.
In M/s. Agi Music Sdn Bhd v. Ilaiyaraja (2023), the Madras High Court explained that royalties (ongoing payments) and consideration (like one-time payments) are different under Section 19(3). It said agreements don’t always need to separate them but must be clear to follow the law.
In Deshmukh & Co. v. Avinash Bhosale (2007), the Bombay High Court used Section 19(5), saying if the time isn’t specified, the transfer lasts only five years and rights return to the creator afterward. This protects creators with clear defaults.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Eastern Indian Motion Pictures Association (1977) influenced later changes by highlighting the rights of creators which led to the 2012 amendment. Recent cases about streaming platforms have supported the rights of creator to royalties for digital uses under Sections 19(9) and (10).
These judgements show that not following Section 19 of Copyright Act can make a transfer invalid which can lead to consequences like court orders stopping the use of the work or requiring payments.
Practical Implications for Copyright Holders and Assignees
Section 19 of the Copyright Act, 1957, helps creators and assignees manage copyright transfers clearly and fairly. For authors and creators, it ensures they can negotiate fair royalties and keep some rights after transferring their work. It also supports joining copyright societies for better bargaining power, and any assignment that conflicts with society rules is invalid.
For Creators
Section 19 of Copyright Act ensures fair royalties and retention of some rights after transferring work and supports joining copyright societies for stronger bargaining power. Any assignment conflicting with society rules will be held invalid.
For Assignees (Publishers/Producers)
Requires carefully drafted agreements to avoid disputes. If terms like duration or territory are not clear then the copyright may revert back to the creator after five years or be limited to India.
Industry Impact
In Bollywood or publishing, compliance with Section 19 of Copyright Act is important for licensing or mergers. Lawyers must suggest clear terms for extensions and royalties to prevent issues.
Summary
Section 19 Copyright Act balances the ability to transfer rights with protections for authors. The provision and the amendments meet modern needs which ensures fair dealings in intellectual property. Lawyers must fully understand Section 19 to advise clients well, create strong agreements, and handle disputes. As digital media grows, court rulings may further shape its use but its focus on clear rules and fairness remains.
Related Posts
Section 19 Copyright Act: FAQs
Q1. What is Section 19A of the Copyright Act?
Section 19A allows the Appellate Board to resolve disputes about copyright assignment terms.
Q2. What is Section 20 of the Copyright Act?
Section 20 establishes the Appellate Board to handle appeals and disputes under the Copyright Act.
Q3. What is the punishment for violating the Copyright Act 1957?
Violating the Copyright Act can lead to imprisonment up to 7 years and/or a fine.
Q4. What is meant by a public undertaking in copyright?
A public undertaking in copyright refers to a government-owned entity involved in copyright-related activities.
