Section 53 of the Trademark Act, 1999, sets provisions about who can start legal action for trademark disputes. It stops people who aren’t officially registered from filing lawsuits for trademark violations. This provision is important for lawyers because it affects how they draft licensing agreements, handle trademark infringement cases and plan trademark strategies. This article explains Section 53 in simple terms, its effects, related case laws, and how it compares to other sections, making it easy for law professionals to understand.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
What are Permitted Users and Registered Users
Section 2(1)(r) of the Trademark Act defines "permitted use" as when someone other than the trademark owner uses the mark. There are two types: use by a registered user and use by a permitted user. A permitted user, under sub-clause (ii), is someone who uses the mark with the owner’s permission through a written agreement. They must follow any provisions or limits tied to the trademark registration. This setup allows flexible licensing without requiring official registration, but Section 53 limits what permitted users can do.
Registered User vs. Permitted User
A registered user, as explained in Section 48, is someone the trademark owner authorizes and registers with the Registrar of Trademarks. To become a registered user, the owner and user must apply together, submit an agreement for quality control, and provide an affidavit from the owner. Registered users get legal recognition and some rights similar to the owner’s.
A permitted user, however, uses the mark under a written agreement or common-law license without formal registration. Their use counts as valid for keeping the trademark active under Section 47, but they don’t get the same legal protections as registered users. This difference shows the Act prefers registration for clarity and stronger enforcement.
What is Section 53 of Trademark Act
Section 53 deals with how trademarks can be used by people other than the owner. In simple terms, Section 53 says that certain users of a trademark called "permitted users" cannot file a lawsuit if someone infringes (copies or misuses) the trademark. Only the official owner or specially registered users can do that. This rule helps keep control with the trademark owner and encourages proper registration of licenses. Let's break it down step by step.
Type 1 (Sub-clause (i)): Use by a registered user. This is someone officially registered with the Trademark Office to use the mark. They must follow rules like maintaining quality and sticking to the owner's conditions.
Type 2 (Sub-clause (ii)): Use by a permitted user. This is anyone else (not the owner or a registered user) who is connected to business or trade, uses the mark for goods or services where it's registered, has the owner's consent in a written agreement and follows any conditions or limits set by the owner and the registration.
In easy words: A registered user is like an official partner with paperwork filed at the government office. A permitted user is like a friend or business associate who has permission on paper but hasn't gone through the full registration process. Section 53 targets only the second type they can't sue for infringement.
Effects and Rights Under Section 53
Section 53 has big impacts on how trademarks are licensed. Permitted users, even with the owner’s permission, cannot sue infringers on their own. They must ask the trademark owner to take action or use common-law remedies, like a “passing off” claim under Section 27(2). Passing off requires proving goodwill, misrepresentation, and harm, which is harder than filing a statutory infringement case, which registered users can do under Section 52.
This restriction encourages people to become registered users because it gives them the right to sue (Section 52) and protects the trademark from being canceled for non-use (Section 46). For trademark owners, Section 53 ensures they keep control, avoiding scattered enforcement that could weaken the mark. However, it might discourage informal licensing since permitted users have fewer protections in disputes.
In business situations, like franchising, parties must decide if registration’s benefits outweigh its costs. Not registering can create risks, especially in complex agreements involving sub-licensing.
Read about the role of Trademark in Cyber Law.
Case Laws Explaining Section 53
Indian courts have supported Section 53 of Trademark Act by stressing that registration is needed for enforcement rights. The cases given below show how courts use Section 53 to ensure only registered parties enforce trademarks, protecting the trademark system’s integrity:
In P.K. Sen v. Exxon Mobile Corporation (2010), the Calcutta High Court said permitted users cannot file infringement lawsuits under Section 134. They can only pursue passing off claims. The court emphasized that Section 53 clearly blocks permitted users from statutory infringement remedies.
In Cycle Corporation of India Ltd. v. T.I. Raleigh Industries Pvt. Ltd. (1996), the Supreme Court confirmed that unregistered users (permitted users) cannot act like owners without registration, supporting Section 53’s limits on sub-licensing and enforcement.
In Haldiram (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Haldiram Bhujiawala (1999), the court said permitted users cannot sue for infringement, encouraging registration to avoid these restrictions.
Comparing Section 53 with Other Sections
Section 53 works with Sections 52 and 54. Section 52 lets registered users sue for infringement, treating their use as if it were the owner’s. Section 54 prevents registered users from transferring or assigning the mark, keeping the owner in control.
Aspect | Registered User (Section 52) | Permitted User (Section 53) |
Right to Sue for Infringement | Can file lawsuits | Cannot file lawsuits |
Protection from Revocation | Use counts as owner’s use | Use counts, but no lawsuit rights |
Quality Control Requirement | Required through agreement and affidavit | Relies on written permission only |
Enforceability Against Others | Strong due to public record | Limited to common-law remedies |
Sub-Licensing | Allowed with owner’s consent | Uncertain, often restricted by courts |
Summary
Section 53 of the Trademark Act, 1999 stops permitted users from filing infringement lawsuits, ensuring only registered owners or users have that power. This promotes registration, improves quality control and prevents misuse. It is important to understand Section 53 to advise clients on licensing and dispute strategies. While the provision may seem strict, it supports the goals of Trademark Act of providing clarity and protection. Future changes might address new needs, like digital licensing, but Section 53 remains a core part of balancing rights and duties in trademark law. Lawyers should always suggest registration to avoid the risks Section 53 highlights, building stronger trademark practices.
Related Posts:
Section 53 of Trademark Act: FAQs
Q1. What is Section 53 of the Trademark Act?
Section 53 stops permitted users (non-registered) from suing for trademark infringement.
Q2. What is Section 52 of the Trademark Act?
Section 52 allows registered users to sue for trademark infringement, acting like the owner.
Q3. What is Section 54 of the Trademark Act?
Section 54 prevents registered users from transferring or assigning their trademark use rights.
Q4. What is licensing of trademark section 48 to 53?
Sections 48 to 53 cover rules for licensing trademarks, defining registered and permitted users, their rights, and limits.
Q5. What is Section 55 of the Trade Marks Act?
Section 55 allows use of a trademark in ways (like exports) that count as use to avoid cancellation.
