Section 31 of IBC 2016, is an important rule that helps manage the process of fixing financial problems for companies that can't pay their debts. It explains how a plan to save the company (called a resolution plan) gets approved and what happens afterward. This section makes sure the process is fair, follows the law, and considers everyone involved, like the company, its workers, creditors, and even the government. It also helps keep things moving quickly to save the company's value and support business growth.
Unlock new career opportunities with The Legal School’s Certification in Bankruptcy & Insolvency Law: Corporate Restructuring & Debt Resolution, in collaboration with IndusLaw. This six-month program, led by industry experts, equips you with critical skills in insolvency litigation, financial distress management, and corporate rescue strategies. Earn a prestigious certificate and elevate your expertise in a rapidly evolving field!
What is Section 31 of IBC?
Section 31 is part of the rules for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), which is a system to help struggling companies either recover or close down in an organized way. It focuses on approving a resolution plan, which is a detailed proposal to fix the company's financial issues. The plan must be fair, workable, and follow the law to ensure everyone involved is treated properly.
Here’s a breakdown of how it works in simple terms:
Approval of the Plan: A special authority called the Adjudicating Authority (AA) checks if the resolution plan meets all the necessary rules (listed in Section 30(2) of the IBC). If it does, the AA approves it, and the plan becomes legally binding. This means the company, its employees, creditors (including banks and government bodies owed taxes or dues), guarantors (people who promised to pay if the company can’t), and others must follow it.
Making Sure It Works: The AA also checks that the plan includes clear steps to make sure it can be carried out successfully.
After Approval: Once the plan is approved, a temporary pause on legal actions against the company (called a moratorium) ends. The person managing the process, called the Resolution Professional (RP), sends all records to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) to keep a record. The company or person taking over must get any required legal permissions within a year (or as required by law).
Court Rulings: Courts have said the resolution plan is like a special legal agreement (not a regular contract). It creates a “fresh start” for the company, meaning old claims can’t pop up after approval. It also applies to guarantors, and the AA can reject plans that ignore government dues, like taxes.
Importance of Section 31 of IBC
Section 31 makes sure the resolution process is clear, follows the law, and is fair for everyone involved. The “fresh slate” rule gives confidence to new investors or companies taking over, encouraging them to participate because they know old debts won’t come back. The fact that guarantors are also bound by the plan protects creditors, ensuring they can still recover some money. However, there are ongoing discussions about balancing the need to help creditors get paid with the goal of helping the company recover, especially when it comes to government dues like taxes, which can complicate things.
Find out What Insolvency is
Detailed Breakdown of Section 31 of IBC
Here’s a clear and simple explanation of each part of Section 31, with what it means and why it matters:
Section 31(1)
The Adjudicating Authority (AA) approves the resolution plan if it follows the rules in Section 30(2). Once approved, it’s legally binding on the company, its employees, owners, creditors (including government bodies owed taxes or other dues), guarantors, and other stakeholders. The AA must make sure the plan has steps to put it into action properly.
This ensures everyone involved must follow the plan, making it legally strong. It also emphasizes that government dues (like taxes) must be considered. This rule started on December 1, 2016, and was updated in 2019 (effective August 16, 2019) to make it clearer that government dues are included.
Section 31(2)
The AA can ascendancy can reject the plan if it doesn’t meet the requirements of Subsection (1).
This gives the AA the power to say “no” to a plan that doesn’t follow the rules, ensuring only fair and legal plans are approved. For example, a court case (Rainbow Papers) showed that a plan can be rejected if it ignores government dues, like taxes.
Section 31(3)
After the plan is approved, the moratorium (a legal pause on actions against the company) ends. The Resolution Professional sends all the process records to the IBBI to be stored in a database.
This step wraps up the process cleanly, making things transparent and allowing the company to move forward with normal operations. This rule has been in place since December 1, 2016.
Section 31(4)
The person or company taking over (the resolution applicant) must get any needed legal approvals within one year of the plan’s approval (or as required by law). If the plan involves merging businesses (called combinations under the Competition Act, 2002), approval from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) is needed before the Committee of Creditors (CoC) approves the plan.
This ensures the plan follows other laws, like those preventing unfair business practices, and sets a timeline for getting approvals. This rule was updated in 2018, effective June 6, 2018.
Also read about Section 33 of IBC, 2016.
Landmark Cases on Section 31
Courts have made important decisions that explain how Section 31 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code works. Here are the key points in simple terms:
Special Kind of Agreement: In a 2021 case (Ebix Singapore Pvt. Ltd. v. CoC of Educomp Solutions Ltd.), the Supreme Court said a resolution plan isn’t a regular contract but a special legal agreement created by the IBC. This means it follows IBC rules, not regular contract laws.
Fresh Start Rule: Cases like Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta and Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. established the “fresh slate” idea. Once the plan is approved, no new claims can be made against the company for old debts, giving it a clean start to operate.
Guarantors Are Included: The plan also applies to guarantors (people who agreed to pay if the company couldn’t). Court cases like Essar Steel India Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Gupta and State Bank of India v. V. Ramakrishnan confirmed that guarantors still have to pay their share, protecting creditors.
Rejecting Bad Plans: In the State Tax Officer v. Rainbow Papers Ltd. case, the court said the AA can reject a plan if it ignores government dues, like taxes, showing how important it is to follow all legal requirements.
Competition Law Approvals: In Independent Sugar Corporation Ltd. v. Girish Sriram Juneja, the court clarified that if the plan involves merging businesses, approval from the Competition Commission of India must happen before the Committee of Creditors approves the plan, to follow competition laws.
Summary
Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, governs the approval of resolution plans in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Adjudicating Authority approves plans meeting Section 30(2) requirements, making them binding on the company, creditors, guarantors, and stakeholders. It ensures plans are feasible and legally sound. Post-approval, the moratorium ends, and records are sent to the IBBI. Courts clarify that plans are statutory contracts, follow a “fresh slate” rule, and require compliance with laws like the Competition Act.
Related Posts:
Section 31 of IBC: FAQs
Q1. What is Section 31 of IBC?
Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, governs the approval of resolution plans in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. It ensures plans meet legal requirements, are binding on all stakeholders, and include implementation provisions.
Q2. What is Section 31 of the Insolvency Act?
There is no "Insolvency Act" in India distinct from the IBC, 2016. You likely mean Section 31 of the IBC, which deals with approving resolution plans, as described above.
Q3. What is Section 31 of the Provincial Insolvency Act?
Section 31 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, allows courts to stay insolvency proceedings if a debtor proposes a composition or scheme to settle debts, subject to court approval.
Q4. What is Section 32 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code?
Section 32 of the IBC, 2016, allows appeals against an Adjudicating Authority’s order approving a resolution plan under Section 31, to be filed within 30 days (extendable by 15 days) at the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
Q5. What is Section 31 of the BNS?
Section 31 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, defines "criminal breach of trust," detailing punishment for dishonestly misappropriating property entrusted to someone, with imprisonment up to 7 years and a fine.
