Legal research is a form of scientific inquiry focused on law, it involves identifying a legal problem, collecting and analyzing authoritative sources (statutes, cases, regulations, scholarly commentary) and drawing conclusions in a logical manner. All research, including legal research, requires a sound design for investigation, a clear plan for how to gather and evaluate data or sources and how to derive meaning from them. Legal research methodology thus provides this plan, ensuring that the researcher proceeds in an organized, objective and rigorous way to answer the question at hand. It is often said that legal research is both a science and an art, since it is a science in terms of methodical precision and an art in the creativity which is required to interpret laws and apply them to complex fact patterns.
Unlock legal research, compliance, and case management expertise with our Advanced Training Program in Paralegal Studies & Legal Documentation. Self-paced, expert-led, and filled with real-world case studies to prepare you for success in law firms and corporate legal teams.
Essential Steps in the Legal Research
While specific techniques may vary as per the kind of research, most legal research follows a series of core steps:
Identifying the Research Problem or Question
All legal research adopts an established question or problem for solution. The thesis statement of a law student examines "whether a new form of digital surveillance breaks constitutional privacy protections." The definition of scope of question remains vital since it directs research towards specific directions. Secondary or news source reading helps researchers normalize their questions before moving forward.
Learn about the basics of How to do Legal Research
Literature Review & Source Gathering
Next, the researcher collects relevant sources. In legal research, this typically means finding primary sources of law (such as constitutions, statutes, case law, regulations) and secondary sources (scholarly articles, treatises, commentaries) that provide analysis or context. A systematic search of legal databases, library catalogs, law journals and online repositories is performed. It is important to evaluate sources for credibility and authority.
Formulating a Hypothesis or Thesis (if applicable)
Academic research together with empirical legal research often requires the researcher to develop a preliminary answer or hypothesis. The researcher forms a hypothesis which states “The new law will significantly reduce cybercrime incidents.” The hypothesis establishes the researcher's anticipated findings that will get verified or disproved by evidence.
Also, Get to Know Examples of Research Topics
Analysis and Synthesis of Information
This is the main step where the researcher carefully examines the materials they have gathered. In doctrinal research, this involves understanding legal texts and resolving disagreements between sources.
The researcher reviews different cases and laws, observes how courts have decided on similar problems, and may connect ideas using established rules. The goal is to find answers or gain new insights from these sources, such as formulating a new rule based on multiple cases.
This step requires analytical reasoning and often iterative reading: as new sources are found, they may alter the researcher’s understanding and require going back to refine the analysis.
A competent researcher maintains an objective approach, developing views based on relevant reasons and shunning irrelevant ones. In other words, conclusions should flow from the evidence, not from personal bias.
Get to Know What Makes Paralegals and Lawyers Different?
Drawing Conclusions
Finally, the researcher draws conclusions that directly respond to the research question. This means stating a main idea, supported by what the research has found, and making the reasoning easy to understand. These conclusions often include suggestions or possible outcomes.
For example, the researcher might recommend changes to a law or give an opinion on how a court might decide on an unsettled matter. These insights are an essential part of the research, offering a way to apply the findings to real-world issues.
The findings are typically written up in a structured format introduction, analysis, conclusion, etc., with appropriate citations. Throughout, proper citation of sources is essential, both to give credit and to substantiate the assertions with authority. Legal writing conventionally uses footnotes (or endnotes) to cite sources in detail.
By following these steps, legal research methodology ensures that research is conducted in a thorough, objective and systematic manner. It provides a roadmap that helps maintain clarity and rigor from the inception of a legal question to the final answer.
In practice, experienced legal researchers might not consciously tick off each “step,” as research can be a nonlinear and recursive process, you might refine your question after some analysis or gather more sources after drafting a section.
In a good research project, all these elements are included. The methodology is what links everything together, ensuring that the final product, whether it's a memo, an article or a legal brief, is built on solid evidence and logical thinking. This helps to make sure the information or arguments presented are believable and well-supported.
Also, gain insight about various Paralegal Courses.
Objective of Legal Research Methodology
The primary objectives of legal research are multifold:
(1) To ascertain the current state of the law on a particular issue – i.e. “what is the law?” – by finding relevant statutes, case law and regulations.
(2) To analyze and interpret legal provisions and principles, resolving ambiguities or uncertainties in the law.
(3) To answer specific legal questions or solve legal problems – for example, determining how a law applies to a set of facts or evaluating whether a legal doctrine should be reformed.
(4) To advance knowledge in the field of law, often by identifying gaps or inconsistencies in legal doctrine and proposing clarifications or improvements. For example, a doctrinal legal research paper, might aim to provide a systematic exposition of the rules governing a legal topic and suggest how those rules could be clarified. In academic settings, a further objective is to train critical thinking and research skills.
While doing legal research, students learn to “think like a lawyer,” developing the ability to find relevant law and case laws and apply logical reasoning to it, a skill that is indispensable in both legal scholarship and practice.
Summary
Legal research methodology is a way to find and use the legal resources correctly. It is a process used to discover the law and incorporate them into your research work. For law students, awareness about research becomes even more important, since law is interpreted by many institutions like judiciary, jurists, advocates, commentaries and since there are so many resources, the research about one topic has to follow proper research methodology in order to save oneself from plagiarism.
Related Posts:
Legal Research Methodology: FAQs
Q1. What is the research methodology?
Research methodology is a process or method to conduct a research and express it in your research work for the supervisor to understand the sources and method of your research.
Q2. Is researching online and using it as a primary research wrong?
It isn't exactly wrong but it does not leave a good impression. It might reflect that you didn't invest much time in researching through actual primary sources. The Internet has a lot of information but there are many which are less accurate and so, making it a primary source might question your research credibility.
Q3. What is the primary source?
Primary source in legal research is anything which is the origin of any text which can include Bare Acts, Bills, Case Laws, Constitution, etc.
Q4. Where should I draft Research Methodology in my research paper?
You must draft Research Methodology before drafting your assignment or research paper.
