One of the most essential elements for formation of contract is defined in Section 13 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 which is ‘Consent’ which requires people and parties to agree on the same terms at the same level of the same meaning. The importance of this principle is that it helps free discussions, and foster transparency and mutual understanding of commitments, leading to increased likelihood of reducing conflicts.

Section 13 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 sets the standard to be followed when entering into a contract, laying out what will and will not constitute valid consent for all parties involved, thus helping to build upon agreements on a grounded foundation of clarity and agreement. This section is the linchpin in the broader accounting of how contract law deals with shared understanding in legally binding transactions.

Elevate your career with a 4-month Certification in Contract Drafting & Negotiation, focusing on AI tools. Gain expertise in drafting contracts across sectors, handling negotiations, and mastering contract life cycle management.

Consent Under Section 13 of Indian Contract Act, 1872

Section 13 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, defines consent as follows:

• It is said, when two or more persons consent, that they agree upon the same thing in the same sense.

• The doctrine of consensus ad idem, or ‘meeting of the minds,’ as a Latin term goes, is encapsulated in this definition. This provision emphasises the importance of all the parties reaching an agreement on the basic terms of the contract without any ambiguity or misunderstanding.

• Consent is the basis of a contractual relationship. It guarantees that parties are even aware of the wording of the contract, much less truly agree to them. A contract entered into without the consent is not only voidable but also void, as depending on the circumstances it may not have a negative value. This safeguard safeguards people from engaging in contracts because they were brought into them under duress, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation or mistake.

Also, Get to Know about What are the 10 Essential Elements of a Valid Contract in Indian Contract Act, 1872.

Elements of Free Consent

Section 13, which defines consent, and Section 14, which elaborates about what constitutes "free consent." Consent is deemed to be free if it is not caused by:

• Coercion: Compulsion of entry into a contract by means of the threat or fear of an unlawful injury.

• Undue Influence: Using powers of one party to inculcate the choice of another party.

• Fraud: Deceit practised for the purposes of procuring a contract.

• Misrepresentation: Giving false information, without intent to deceive.

• Mistake: Error or misunderstanding with regard to the terms or subject matter of the contract.

The vitiating factor being compromised, when consent is put to the risk of being voided or the enforcement is vitiated, the affected party will have the remedy either of cancelling the contract or enforcing the contract with altered terms.

Also, Get to Know Is Contract Management is a Good Career

Effect of lack of consent

Lack of real consent can bring very serious legal consequences. Depending on the cause, a contract can be declared:

• Voidable: If not free, the aggrieved party may void the contract.

• Void: However, if the contract has the absence of consent, meaning if that's the case then like bilateral mistake the contract is void.

Find out the Differences Between Void & Voidable Contract

The Doctrine of Consensus Ad Idem.

Consensus ad idem is the principle of the agreement among the parties involved so that all of the parties to a contract have unified a view of what the agreement is. 

• Take the example of crude oil and olive oil where two parties decide to sell a certain “barrel of oil” but one party refers to crude oil while other thinks of olive oil. There is no such consensus ad idem, so no valid consent under Section 13 in the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

• Section 13 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 has great application under the existing circumstances of modern commercial environment. The current world of globalisation and complex transactions has come to prefer mutual consent in contracts. 

• For example, in e-commerce most view consent in the form of electronic agreements when two parties may not be actually present. However, the principle of consensus ad idem remains paramount to attain fairness and clarity.

Also, Get to Know How Right to seek justice cannot be prejudged under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act, 1872

Legislative Safeguards and Remedies

To address potential issues arising from lack of consent, the Indian Contract Act, 1872, provides remedies for aggrieved parties:

• Rescission of Contract: The agreement can be terminated and the affected party put back in its original condition.

• Damages: In the case of fraud or misrepresentation the aggrieved party is able to pursue claims for relief of compensation for such losses.

• Reformation: Finally the court can alter the contract terms to align with the true intention of the parties. 

Find out Which Agreements without Consideration are considered Void under Section 25 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872

Difference between Consent and Free Consent

Following are the differences between Consent under Section 13 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Free Consent under Section 14 of Indian Contract Act, 1872:

• Legally, consent and free consent are closely related, they have different meanings as used in the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Consent, as defined under Section 13, is a mutual agreement between the parties who agree upon the same in the same sense as means. This makes sure that the parties have the same understanding of the contractual terms and have identical intentions.

• However, free consent (as explained in Section 14) is such consent by free consent that there has been no coercion in the giving of the consent, nor undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake. While yes to consent means agreement, free consent means agreement that hasn’t been pushed or unintentionally coerced.

• What differs most is how the contract is valid. The first basic requirement for any agreement is consent, if consent is not present, a contract is void. Although free consent addresses the quality of consent, free consent does not address the quantity or quality of the 'volunteers.' The contract is voidable if the consent is not free. Suppose the consent comes about by threat, then even if the person allows his property to be sold, the consent is not free, and the contract is voidable.

Also, Get to Know What are the Common Clauses in Legal Contracts

Let’s Sum it Up

The necessity of mutual consent or agreement is one of the aspects of entering into valid contracts, stated in section 13 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 thereby, the parties have a shared understanding and agreement on the terms. Consensus ad idem is a foundational principle, and Section 14 goes on to describe what ought to be free consent and to be clear of coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation and mistake. For this reason, together these provisions protect contractual fairness and transparency while dealing with challenges of modern commerce and providing remedies against the lack of genuine consent. The fruits of this framework are the maintenance of the integrity of legal agreements and reflect the continuing pertinence of these principles in modern day business and law.

Also, Get to Know the Key Difference Between Contract of Indemnity & Contract of Guarantee

Section 13 of Indian Contract Act, 1872: FAQs

Q1 What does Section 13 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 define?

Section 13 defines consent as when two or more persons agree upon the same thing in the same sense.

Q2. What is the reason for ensuring there is consent in contracts?

Consent provides a mutual understanding between the parties and the agreement on words before the statement of the contract is made.

Q3. What is the doctrine of consensus ad idem?

It is one that asserts that parties must agree on the same terms in the same sense — meaning a unification of the parties’ understanding of the contract.

Q4. If there is no consent in a contract, what happens?

The contract will also be found voided if there is no lack of agreement between the parties.

Q5. What is the difference between free consent and consent?

Consent is said to be agreement on things that may occur, and free consent is when the agreement is voluntary, rather than coerced, frauded, etc.