Patent revocation refers to the procedure whereby a patent is canceled or invalidated by either a court of law or by the patent office of that jurisdiction. Thus, the relevant patent office would be either the Indian Patent Office or the Intellectual Property Appellate Board - IPAB. In the case of revocation, the patentee would lose his rights associated with the patent, and thus, protection of the invention is removed.

Revocation usually happens when it is discovered that the patent should not have been granted in the first place, either because it does not meet the legal requirements for patentability, or due to improper conduct during the patenting process.

Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!

Why Patents Are Revoked?

• Invalidity of the Patent: The patent might not satisfy the necessary legal requirements for patentability, including novelty (the invention should be new), inventive step (it should be a non-obvious innovation), and industrial applicability (the invention should be useful).

• Fraud or Misrepresentation: The patent has been granted based on wrong or false information submitted by the applicant, like not disclosing the prior art knowledge or inventions that have existed or making false statements of the invention.

• Improper Disclosure: A patent can be canceled in case the inventor does not explain or describe how to make and use the invention, which causes a problem for others.

• Non-payment of Maintenance Fees: If a patent holder fails to pay the required annual fees on time to keep the patent in force, the patent can be revoked, or the rights can be deemed as expired.

How Patents Are Revoked?

• By the Patent Office: A party can file a petition for revocation with the patent office (Patent Office). The office will then study the grounds for revocation and may start to conduct an investigation.

• By a Court: Revocation of Patent can also be sought by judicial proceedings. A party that feels a patent is invalid can challenge it before the court (for example, in India, the High Courts or IPAB may entertain cases of revocation of patents).

• During Patent Infringement Cases: On some occasions, a respondent can file for revocation and as a way of using such a defense, alleges the patent to be invalid, that is, it never had the right to the granting.

Patent Revocation vs. Patent Invalidation

While the terms "revocation" and "invalidation" are often used synonymously, they may connote different meanings depending on the jurisdiction. In some contexts, "revocation" refers to formal cancellation of the legal status of the patent, while "invalidation" usually pertains to a determination that the patent should never have been granted, for failing to comply with the required standards.

Understanding patent revocation is not only important for patent owners but also for competitors and others who may be involved in either challenging a patent or defending against infringement claims.

Also, Get to Know Patent Filling Procedure In India

Practical Examples of Patent Revocation

Practical examples can further illustrate how patent revocation works in different industries, showing how the process is applied to real-world scenarios.

Example 1: Revocation Due to Lack of Novelty

A drug firm files for patent application regarding compound which is used in certain type of medical disease treatment. After investigation it gets an argument that the compound already have similar therapeutic effect of existing another firm patented compound three or more years back.

Patent Office reject the application because that drug has no novelty, as they have no rights for grant for that patent.

Example 2: Revocation Due to Non-disclosure

An inventor patents a new machine designed to improve manufacturing efficiency. However, upon examination, it is found that the inventor did not disclose important technical details regarding the machine's components, making it difficult for others to replicate the invention.

Revocation:

The patent is revoked on the grounds that the inventor did not fulfill the disclosure requirement under patent law, which mandates that the patent application must enable others skilled in the art to recreate the invention.

Learn the Step by Step Procedure for Patent Registration In India

Example 3: Revocation in the Tech Industry

A tech company files a patent for a software algorithm used in data processing. During the revocation proceeding, it is found that the algorithm had been in public use for years before the patent was filed and was available in open-source platforms.

The patent is revoked because the algorithm was not novel; it had already been disclosed publicly and thus lacked the required novelty to be patented.

Conclusion 

Patent revocation is a mechanism in the patent system that ensures a patent is granted only to such inventions that are novel and innovative. It protects the public interest, especially with regard to pharmaceutical industries, as patents on vital medicines have a direct consequence on their affordability and access. Though the process of revoking patents may be lengthy and complex, it serves an important function in ensuring a balanced intellectual property system.

Patent holders are required to observe that all the legal parameters of their patents, that is novelty, inventive step, and full disclosure. The challenger's evidence must, therefore, be strong enough in support of the claims to invalidate a patent. Such parties both have to understand the subtleties in the process of law properly, since successful revocation might have huge consequences.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Patent Revocation

Q1. What is the difference between patent revocation and patent invalidation?

Patent Revocation: This is the formal annulment of a granted patent, typically done by a legal authority like the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) or the High Court, after a third-party petition is filed, challenging the patent’s validity. The revocation process usually happens after the patent is granted and affects its enforceability. Patent Invalidation: Invalidation refers to the determination that a patent should not have been granted in the first place due to reasons such as failure to meet patentability criteria (novelty, inventive step, etc.). This can be done through litigation or administrative proceedings.

Q2. How long does the patent revocation process take in India?

The duration of the patent revocation process in India can vary depending on the complexity of the case and the number of parties involved. On average, the process can take anywhere from 6 months to 2 years. Factors such as legal appeals, gathering evidence, and expert testimony can influence the timeline.

Q3. Can a patent holder appeal against a revocation decision?

Yes, a patent holder can appeal a revocation decision. If the patent is revoked by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB), the patent holder can file an appeal with the High Court. The appeal process allows the patent holder to present new evidence or legal arguments to reverse the revocation decision.

Q4. Is it possible to get a patent reinstated after revocation?

Once a patent is revoked, it cannot be automatically reinstated. However, in certain circumstances, the patent holder may reapply for the patent with modifications, provided they address the issues that led to the revocation. This may involve altering the patent’s claims or providing additional supporting evidence to meet the patentability criteria.

Q5. What are the consequences if a patent is revoked after a product has been commercialized?

If a patent is revoked after the product has been commercialized, the manufacturer can no longer rely on the patent to prevent others from making, using, or selling the invention. The revocation can impact the company’s competitive edge and could potentially lead to legal disputes over patent infringement, especially if the patent had been used to assert exclusivity in the market. Additionally, the business may face financial losses, especially if the patent was crucial for protecting a key product.