Copyright law in India, governed by the Copyright Act of 1957, protects creators’ rights over original works such as books, music, films and art. The Act grants exclusive rights to control reproduction, distribution and public performance for a set period. However, these rights are balanced with exceptions to promote public access to knowledge and creativity. One key exception is “fair dealing,” which allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for specific purposes. This article explores fair dealing in Indian Copyright Law, its legal basis, applications, judicial interpretations and recent developments as of 2025.
Step into the future of legal expertise! Join our Advanced Certification Program in Intellectual Property Law, created by The Legal School in collaboration with Khaitan & Co. Designed for fresh law graduates and professionals, this unique course boosts your legal career. Don’t miss this opportunity—enquire today to secure your spot!
What is Fair Dealing?
Fair dealing permits the use of copyrighted works without the copyright owner’s permission, provided that the use aligns with specific purposes as per the law. It seeks to balance the monopolistic rights of creators with the interest of the society in accessing and using creative works for education, commentary or public discourse. Unlike the fair use doctrine in the United States which applies to a wide range of uses, fair dealing in Indian Copyright Law is more restrictive since it is limited to purposes explicitly defined in the Copyright Act.
Legal Basis of Fair Dealing in Indian Copyright Law
Fair dealing in Indian Copyright Law is primarily governed by Section 52 of Copyright Act, 1957 which lists acts that do not constitute copyright infringement. These include
Private or Personal Use: Using copyrighted works for personal study or research.
Criticism or Review: Quoting or reproducing parts of a work to critique or review it or another work.
Reporting Current Events: Using copyrighted material in news reports or commentary on public affairs.
Judicial Proceedings: Reproducing works for legal proceedings or reports.
Incidental Inclusion: Including copyrighted material in films or broadcasts if it is incidental and not the primary focus.
Special Provisions for Disabled Persons: The Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012, extended fair dealing to include access to works for educational or personal use by disabled individuals.
Section 52 is influenced by international frameworks like Article 13 of the TRIPS Agreement and Article 9(2) of the Berne Convention, which allow exceptions that do not conflict with the normal exploitation of a work or unreasonably prejudice the copyright owner’s rights.
Also, Get to Know About Infringement of Geographical Indication.
Purposes of Fair Dealing in Indian Copyright Law
Fair dealing is restricted to specific purposes in order to ensure that it serves the public interest without undermining the rights of a creator. The purposes of fair dealing include the following
Private or Personal Use: Users can use copyrighted works for private study or research such as a student quoting a textbook in an academic paper.
Criticism or Review: Critics or reviewers can use excerpts to analyze or evaluate a work, like quoting a novel in a book review.
Reporting Current Events: Journalists can use copyrighted material in news reports, such as including film clips in a news segment about a movie release.
Judicial Proceedings: Legal professionals can reproduce works for case laws or legal reports without infringing copyright.
The 2012 amendment also expanded the scope to include cinematograph films and musical works, especially for educational purposes and accessibility for disabled persons, reflecting India’s commitment to inclusive access to knowledge.
Factors Determining Fair Dealing
The judiciary assess fair dealing on a case-by-case basis by considering various factors in order to determine if a use is permissible or not
Factor | Description |
Purpose of Use | Must align with Section 52 purposes (e.g., research, criticism, news reporting). |
Nature of the Work | Factual works (e.g., news articles) are more likely to qualify than creative ones (e.g., novels). |
Amount and Substantiality | The portion used must be reasonable; using a small, non-essential part is more likely to be fair. |
Market Impact | The use should not harm the original work’s market or act as a substitute. |
Transformative Nature | Uses that add new value or insights (e.g., commentary) are favored over mere reproduction. |
These factors ensure that fair dealing respects both the creator’s rights and the public’s interest in accessing information.
Read about What is a Trade Secret?
Fair Dealing in the Digital Age
The digital age has introduced new complexities for fair dealing. Online platforms like YouTube use automated systems like Content ID to detect copyrighted material, but these systems often fail to recognize fair dealing exceptions, leading to erroneous takedowns. This creates challenges for creators who rely on fair dealing for commentary, reviews, or educational content.
Creators must navigate these challenges by:
Using only the minimal necessary portion of a work.
Ensuring the use is transformative (e.g., adding commentary or critique).
Providing clear attribution to the original creator.
Articulating the purpose under Section 52.
Copyright owners can pursue remedies like cease and desist notices, takedowns, injunctions, or damages, while users can defend themselves using fair dealing or counter-notifications under Section 60 of the Copyright Act for groundless threats.
Read about Copyright Laws in You Tube
Difference Between Fair Dealing & Fair Use
Fair dealing in Indian Copyright Law differs from the U.S. fair use doctrine, which is broader and codified in Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976. The U.S. considers four factors similar to India’s but applies them to any purpose, not just those listed in the law. India’s fair dealing is more rigid since it is limited to specific purposes, which restricts flexibility but still provides clarity. The fair use doctrine approach allows courts to interpret a wider range of uses, while India relies on statutory definitions and judicial discretion.
Aspect | India (Fair Dealing) | U.S. (Fair Use) |
Scope | Limited to specific purposes (Section 52). | Broad, applies to any purpose. |
Legal Basis | Copyright Act, 1957, Section 52. | Copyright Act of 1976, Section 107. |
Factors | Purpose, nature, amount, market impact. | Same, but more flexible application. |
Examples | Research, criticism, news reporting. | Parody, education, transformative uses. |
Summary
Fair dealing enables limited use of copyrighted works for purposes like research, criticism and news reporting. It balances creators’ rights with public access and fosters creativity and free expression. It is governed by Section 52 of Copyright Act, 1957 and is shaped by judicial precedents, remains a dynamic doctrine, evolving with digital advancements and societal needs. As of 2025, ongoing discussions highlight its importance in the digital age along with urging creators and users to navigate its boundaries carefully to avoid legal issues while promoting innovation.
Related Posts
Fair Dealing in Indian Copyright Law: FAQs
Q1. What is fair dealing in Indian copyright law?
Fair dealing allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission for purposes like research, criticism, or news reporting as per Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957. It balances creators’ rights with public access.
Q2. How is fair dealing different from fair use in the U.S.?
Fair dealing in Indian copyright law is limited to specific purposes listed in the Copyright Act, while U.S. fair use is broader since it is applicable to any purpose.
Q3. Can I use a movie clip in a YouTube video under fair dealing?
Yes, if the clip is used for criticism, review, or news reporting and is minimal and transformative, but excessive use or lack of commentary may not qualify.
Q4. What factors do Indian courts consider for fair dealing?
Courts evaluate the purpose, amount used, nature of the work, market impact and whether the use is transformative, ensuring it aligns with Section 52.
Q5. Does fair dealing apply to digital content in 2025?
Yes, but digital platforms like YouTube may flag fair dealing uses due to automated systems, requiring creators to justify their use under Section 52 or file counter-notifications.
