Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) encompasses the mediation, conciliation, and arbitration methods of settling disputes beyond traditional court systems. The arbitration agreement process is unique in that it commits the parties to a structured and binding resolution process to settle disputes through arbitration. These agreements are fundamental in defining the scope, rules, and procedures of the arbitration process, ensuring clarity and mutual understanding between parties. This article delves into the heart of arbitration agreements within ADR by examining their legal foundations and key components.
Arbitration Agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides definition and requirements for a valid arbitration agreement under Indian law. Each subsection is elaborated here below:
Subsection (1): Definition of Arbitration Agreement
An arbitration agreement is defined as an agreement between parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes that have arisen or may arise between them concerning a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not. This broad definition encompasses both existing and future disputes related to any legal relationship.
Subsection (2): Forms of Arbitration Agreement
The arbitration agreement can take one of the following forms:
It can be an arbitration clause contained within a contract.
It can exist independently as a separate agreement.
This flexibility allows parties to determine how they would want to record their arbitration agreement.
Subsection (3): Requirement for Writing
An arbitration agreement must be in writing to be enforceable. This ensures clarity and provides a tangible record of the parties' consent to arbitrate.
Subsection (4): Criteria for Written Agreement
An agreement is considered "in writing" if it is:
Contained in a document signed by the parties.
Established through an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams, or other means of telecommunication, including electronic communication, that provide a record of the agreement.
Formed by an exchange of statements of claim and defense in which one party alleges the existence of an arbitration agreement, and the other party does not deny it.
This subsection recognizes various forms of written communication, including electronic means, as valid documentation of an arbitration agreement.
Know the Key Differences between Arbitration & Conciliation
Subsection (5): Incorporation by Reference
A reference to another document in an arbitration agreement shall be deemed an arbitration agreement if:
(a) The reference is such that the document referred to thereby becomes an exhibit to the arbitration agreement in writing.
(b) The contract is in writing.
Are you interested in pursuing a career in Law? The Legal School in collaboration with IndusLaw has created unique programs for a Certification in Mergers & Acquisitions, Private Equity and Venture Capital Laws & Certification in Mergers & Acquisitions for fresh law graduates as well as professionals looking to advance in their careers! Enquire now for details!
Case Laws on Interpreting Arbitration Agreements
Arbitration agreements are pivotal in Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), and their interpretation has been significantly shaped by judicial decisions.
N.N. Global Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. v. Indo Unique Flame Ltd. (2021)
The Court held that an unstamped arbitration agreement is unenforceable, emphasizing the necessity of proper stamping for the validity of such agreements.
Chloro Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc. (2013)
The Court held that even non-signatories to an arbitration agreement could be bound by it if they are directly involved in the contract or the dispute. This expanded the applicability of arbitration agreements, recognizing the "group of companies" doctrine.
Know in detail about Best Law Certificate Courses to Upskill
In Short,
Arbitration agreements are fundamental to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as they provide a structured framework by which parties can derive mutually acceptable resolutions outside of the traditional court system. There are some benefits of arbitration agreements that make them highly preferable: confidentiality, flexibility, and the choice of specialized arbitrators for particular cases in specific sectors.
The future will witness arbitration agreements and mechanisms being fashioned by electronic means of online dispute resolution platforms as well as through virtual hearings. These concepts have increasingly been moved towards making the process more accessible and time-efficient. Finally, the ever growing nature of cross-border business transactions needs arbitration agreements to be better-equipped with the handling of myriad cross-border conflicts while accounting for diverse legal systems and cultures.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Arbitration Agreements
Q1. What does it take for an arbitration agreement to be valid?
A valid arbitration agreement is one where parties agree, in writing, to refer to all disputes falling within the ambit of the disputes referred to arbitration instead of referring to litigation. The arbitration agreement shall be an agreement to submit present or future disputes to arbitration, in exchange for a legally binding contract. That is, it explicitly states that both parties intend to arbitrate, specifically what aspects fall under arbitration, and also must be signed by all parties. It may appear as an independent document or as an arbitration clause in some other contract. Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides this requirement in India.
Q2. Can arbitration agreements be enforced outside of the borders of a country?
Arbitration agreements may also be enforced internationally, for instance through the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards to which India is also a signatory. Such convention renders enforceable arbitration agreements and awards beyond the borders of signatory countries where such agreements are in writing and the subject matter falls within the scope of arbitrable disputes under the law of the enforcing country.
Q3. How is the arbitrator selected under an arbitration agreement?
The number of arbitrators (usually one, three) as well as the method and means of their appointment are usually agreed upon under the arbitration agreement. In the absence of such an agreement, the relevant institutional rules, such as those of the International Chamber of Commerce, or the national law of a country for instance, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 apply by default. For instance, in India, if parties cannot agree on the appointment of an arbitrator, Section 11 of the Act gives them the authority to seek the court's aid in appointment.
Q4. Is the Act silent when the parties who have entered an arbitration agreement do not proceed to arbitration?
If the party refuses to arbitrate in accordance with an existing arbitration agreement, the other party can move court for judicial intervention that will help to enforce the arbitration agreement. Under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in India, a party can apply to the court to refer the matter to arbitration. The said court is satisfied that there is a valid arbitration agreement between parties, then the said court shall order the parties to refer the dispute to arbitration. This principle of contract obligation is thus sustained.
Q5. Can an arbitration agreement be challenged or declared null and void?
Yes. An arbitration agreement can be challenged on grounds such as incapacity of a party, illegality of the agreement, lack of proper consent, or if the subject matter is not arbitrable under the law. Specifically, in India, Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 prescribes specific grounds for setting aside an arbitral award and, by implication, indirectly touches upon the underlying validity of the arbitration agreement. These grounds are mainly where the arbitration agreement is found to be invalid under the law or where the award concerns a dispute that is not referred to arbitration under the arbitration agreement.
